Page 33 - Metaphysical questions of life
P. 33

selves to enter into the spiritual world. That is the mystery of this mate-
      rial crea on. Actually the living en ty is originally the spiritual part and
      parcel of the Supreme Lord, but due to his rebellious nature, he is con-
      di oned  within  material  nature.  It  really  does  not  ma er  how  these
      living  en  es  or superior  en  es of  the  Supreme  Lord  have  come in
      contact  with  material  nature.  The  Supreme  Personality  of  Godhead

      knows, however, how and why this actually took place. In the scrip-
      tures the Lord says that those a racted by this material nature are un-
      dergoing a hard struggle for existence. But we should know it with cer-
      tainty  from  the  descrip ons  of  these  few  verses  that  all  transfor-
      ma ons and influences of material nature by the three modes are also

      produc ons of material nature. All transforma ons and variety in re-
      spect to living en  es are due to the body. As far as spirit is concerned,
      living en  es are all the same.”

      Atheists and most scien sts deny there is a God who has a
      plan for His material crea on


      The  en re  material crea on is  conducted  in sync  with the plan  of
      Krishna. Those persons who ignore spiritual knowledge think that the
      material world happened by accident and is proceeding without a spe-
      cific purpose. The myriad number of speculators made up of philoso-
      phers and scien sts imagine many theories how the material nature

      evolved. There is no factual basis for their theories that change every
      few years. For example, Stephen Hawkings and other scien sts change
      their theories o en:

      “A er almost 30 years of arguing that a black hole swallows up every-
      thing  that  falls  into  it,  astrophysicist  Stephen  Hawking  backpedaled
      Thursday. In doing so, he lost one of the most famous bets in recent
      scien fic history.”

      “The world-famous author of a "Brief History of Time" said he and oth-
      er scien sts had go en it wrong —the galac c traps may in fact allow


                                        33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38