Page 21 - Defending Prabhupada Words - By Harivlas Das
P. 21

We  will  proceed  to  reveal  point  by  point  how  Brahma
            das  purposely  misinterprets  statements  and  makes  false
            allegations and conclusions about the words of His Divine
            Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Srila Prabhupada.


            Brahma das asks, “Are women always required to be under
            the direct protection of a man?” The answer he gives is no.
            According the SB 9.10.11 as discussed above, the answer is
            yes.  Srila Prabhupada has simply repeated the scriptural
            knowledge in this respect and Brahma das is emphatically
            trying to say that Srila Prabhupada’s scriptural statement is
            wrong and therefore can be ignored. The question to ask is
            why Brahma das is trying to debunk a scripturally correct
            statement made by Srila Prabhupada?


            Brahma das writes, “Furthermore Bhaktivinoda says that
            even scripture is affected by the bias of its author(s). He
            writes: “It is an obvious fact that a man is greatly devoted to
            his homeland and even great sages (who wrote scripture)
            were influenced by this tendency.”


            Srila Prabhupada grew up at the end of the 19th century
            and early 20th century in a culture where Indian women
            were  submissive  and  dedicated  to  raising  children  and
            maintaining  home  and  hearth.  Srila  Prabhupada  has
            simply repeated “According to the Vedic rule, there is no
            scope for a woman being independent (asmaksam), for a
            woman cannot protect herself independently.”
          20





                                                                09-02-2023   17:30:16
 Defending Prabhupada Words insid e.indd   20                   09-02-2023   17:30:16
 Defending Prabhupada Words inside.indd   20
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26